Detailed Information on Publication Record
2024
Resilient heuristic aggregation of judgments in the pairwise comparisons method
KULAKOWSKI, Konrad, Jacek SZYBOWSKI, Jiří MAZUREK and Sebastian ERNSTBasic information
Original name
Resilient heuristic aggregation of judgments in the pairwise comparisons method
Authors
KULAKOWSKI, Konrad (616 Poland), Jacek SZYBOWSKI (616 Poland), Jiří MAZUREK (203 Czech Republic, guarantor, belonging to the institution) and Sebastian ERNST (616 Poland)
Edition
Information Sciences, 2024, 0020-0255
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Článek v odborném periodiku
Field of Study
10200 1.2 Computer and information sciences
Country of publisher
United States of America
Confidentiality degree
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
References:
Organization unit
School of Business Administration in Karvina
UT WoS
111111111111111
Keywords in English
Pairwise comparisons; Manipulation; Group decision making; Pairwise comparisons matrix; Analytic hierarchy process
Links
GA21-03085S, research and development project.
Změněno: 23/10/2024 10:58, doc. Mgr. Jiří Mazurek, Ph.D.
Abstract
V originále
In decision-making methods, it is common to assume that the experts are honest and professional. However, this is not the case when one or more experts in the pairwise-based group decisionmaking framework, such as the group analytic hierarchy process, try to manipulate results in their favor. This paper aims to introduce two heuristics enabling detection of manipulators and minimizing their effect on the group consensus by diminishing their weights. The first heuristic is based on the assumption that manipulators will provide judgments that can be considered outliers with respect to those of the other experts in the group. The second heuristic assumes that dishonest judgments are less consistent than the average consistency of the group. Both approaches are illustrated with numerical examples and simulations