2025
Czechia: social workers as members of the Czech parliament
ZOGATA KUSZ, Agnieszka a Tatiana MATULAYOVÁZákladní údaje
Originální název
Czechia: social workers as members of the Czech parliament
Autoři
ZOGATA KUSZ, Agnieszka a Tatiana MATULAYOVÁ
Vydání
2025. vyd. Bristol, Social Workers in Political Office: A Comparative Perspective on Recruitment, Career Patterns and Social Advocacy, od s. 47-63, 17 s. Research in Social Work, 2025
Nakladatel
Bristol University Press
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Obor
50900 5.9 Other social sciences
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/47813059:19510/25:A0000585
Organizační jednotka
Fakulta veřejných politik v Opavě
ISBN
978-1-4473-7348-3
Klíčová slova anglicky
social work; political office; policy engagment; political participation; political recruiment; political career; social workers; parliament; dupties; Czechia
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 6. 3. 2026 17:45, Ing. Lucie Chmelařová
Anotace
V originále
Despite their critical role in addressing social issues, Czech social workers have played a limited role in shaping national policy. This chapter examines their political participation in the Czech parliament and the factors influencing it, including the social work environment and institutional opportunity structures. It also explores their career pathways and social advocacy. Using an exploratory approach, the study identifies eight social workers—spanning the entire parliamentary spectrum—who have held parliamentary seats since 2006. The analysis reveals that despite the profession’s low political profile, social workers are overrepresented in parliament relative to their share of the workforce. Findings indicate that social workers follow general patterns of Czech political careers, often beginning at the municipal level before advancing nationally. However, professional and institutional barriers—such as the weak political emphasis in social work education, professional fragmentation, and gender disparities—limit broader engagement. While some social workers in parliament actively advocate for social policies, their engagement varies based on professional background and political alignment. The chapter argues that strengthening macro-policy education and fostering professional unity could enhance social workers’ capacity to drive systemic change. Ultimately, it highlights their potential as political actors while acknowledging structural and professional limitations.