C 2025

Czechia: social workers as members of the Czech parliament

ZOGATA KUSZ, Agnieszka a Tatiana MATULAYOVÁ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Czechia: social workers as members of the Czech parliament

Autoři

ZOGATA KUSZ, Agnieszka a Tatiana MATULAYOVÁ

Vydání

2025. vyd. Bristol, Social Workers in Political Office: A Comparative Perspective on Recruitment, Career Patterns and Social Advocacy, od s. 47-63, 17 s. Research in Social Work, 2025

Nakladatel

Bristol University Press

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize

Obor

50900 5.9 Other social sciences

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Forma vydání

tištěná verze "print"

Odkazy

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/47813059:19510/25:A0000585

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta veřejných politik v Opavě

ISBN

978-1-4473-7348-3

Klíčová slova anglicky

social work; political office; policy engagment; political participation; political recruiment; political career; social workers; parliament; dupties; Czechia

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 6. 3. 2026 17:45, Ing. Lucie Chmelařová

Anotace

V originále

Despite their critical role in addressing social issues, Czech social workers have played a limited role in shaping national policy. This chapter examines their political participation in the Czech parliament and the factors influencing it, including the social work environment and institutional opportunity structures. It also explores their career pathways and social advocacy. Using an exploratory approach, the study identifies eight social workers—spanning the entire parliamentary spectrum—who have held parliamentary seats since 2006. The analysis reveals that despite the profession’s low political profile, social workers are overrepresented in parliament relative to their share of the workforce. Findings indicate that social workers follow general patterns of Czech political careers, often beginning at the municipal level before advancing nationally. However, professional and institutional barriers—such as the weak political emphasis in social work education, professional fragmentation, and gender disparities—limit broader engagement. While some social workers in parliament actively advocate for social policies, their engagement varies based on professional background and political alignment. The chapter argues that strengthening macro-policy education and fostering professional unity could enhance social workers’ capacity to drive systemic change. Ultimately, it highlights their potential as political actors while acknowledging structural and professional limitations.