C 2025

Czechia: social workers as members of the Czech parliament

ZOGATA KUSZ, Agnieszka and Tatiana MATULAYOVÁ

Basic information

Original name

Czechia: social workers as members of the Czech parliament

Authors

ZOGATA KUSZ, Agnieszka and Tatiana MATULAYOVÁ

Edition

2025. vyd. Bristol, Social Workers in Political Office: A Comparative Perspective on Recruitment, Career Patterns and Social Advocacy, p. 47-63, 17 pp. Research in Social Work, 2025

Publisher

Bristol University Press

Other information

Language

English

Type of outcome

Chapter(s) of a specialized book

Field of Study

50900 5.9 Other social sciences

Country of publisher

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Confidentiality degree

is not subject to a state or trade secret

Publication form

printed version "print"

References:

Marked to be transferred to RIV

Yes

RIV identification code

RIV/47813059:19510/25:A0000585

Organization unit

Faculty of Public Policies in Opava

ISBN

978-1-4473-7348-3

Keywords in English

social work; political office; policy engagment; political participation; political recruiment; political career; social workers; parliament; dupties; Czechia

Tags

International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 6/3/2026 17:45, Ing. Lucie Chmelařová

Abstract

In the original language

Despite their critical role in addressing social issues, Czech social workers have played a limited role in shaping national policy. This chapter examines their political participation in the Czech parliament and the factors influencing it, including the social work environment and institutional opportunity structures. It also explores their career pathways and social advocacy. Using an exploratory approach, the study identifies eight social workers—spanning the entire parliamentary spectrum—who have held parliamentary seats since 2006. The analysis reveals that despite the profession’s low political profile, social workers are overrepresented in parliament relative to their share of the workforce. Findings indicate that social workers follow general patterns of Czech political careers, often beginning at the municipal level before advancing nationally. However, professional and institutional barriers—such as the weak political emphasis in social work education, professional fragmentation, and gender disparities—limit broader engagement. While some social workers in parliament actively advocate for social policies, their engagement varies based on professional background and political alignment. The chapter argues that strengthening macro-policy education and fostering professional unity could enhance social workers’ capacity to drive systemic change. Ultimately, it highlights their potential as political actors while acknowledging structural and professional limitations.