2025
Czechia: social workers as members of the Czech parliament
ZOGATA KUSZ, Agnieszka and Tatiana MATULAYOVÁBasic information
Original name
Czechia: social workers as members of the Czech parliament
Authors
ZOGATA KUSZ, Agnieszka and Tatiana MATULAYOVÁ
Edition
2025. vyd. Bristol, Social Workers in Political Office: A Comparative Perspective on Recruitment, Career Patterns and Social Advocacy, p. 47-63, 17 pp. Research in Social Work, 2025
Publisher
Bristol University Press
Other information
Language
English
Type of outcome
Chapter(s) of a specialized book
Field of Study
50900 5.9 Other social sciences
Country of publisher
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Confidentiality degree
is not subject to a state or trade secret
Publication form
printed version "print"
References:
Marked to be transferred to RIV
Yes
RIV identification code
RIV/47813059:19510/25:A0000585
Organization unit
Faculty of Public Policies in Opava
ISBN
978-1-4473-7348-3
Keywords in English
social work; political office; policy engagment; political participation; political recruiment; political career; social workers; parliament; dupties; Czechia
Tags
International impact, Reviewed
Changed: 6/3/2026 17:45, Ing. Lucie Chmelařová
Abstract
In the original language
Despite their critical role in addressing social issues, Czech social workers have played a limited role in shaping national policy. This chapter examines their political participation in the Czech parliament and the factors influencing it, including the social work environment and institutional opportunity structures. It also explores their career pathways and social advocacy. Using an exploratory approach, the study identifies eight social workers—spanning the entire parliamentary spectrum—who have held parliamentary seats since 2006. The analysis reveals that despite the profession’s low political profile, social workers are overrepresented in parliament relative to their share of the workforce. Findings indicate that social workers follow general patterns of Czech political careers, often beginning at the municipal level before advancing nationally. However, professional and institutional barriers—such as the weak political emphasis in social work education, professional fragmentation, and gender disparities—limit broader engagement. While some social workers in parliament actively advocate for social policies, their engagement varies based on professional background and political alignment. The chapter argues that strengthening macro-policy education and fostering professional unity could enhance social workers’ capacity to drive systemic change. Ultimately, it highlights their potential as political actors while acknowledging structural and professional limitations.