J 2026

Economic and fiscal aspects of brownfield regeneration in Czechia: Cost structures and policy implications

ŠKRABAL, Jaroslav; Michal TVRDOŇ; Michal KRAJŇÁK a Martina PAVLAČKOVÁ

Základní údaje

Originální název

Economic and fiscal aspects of brownfield regeneration in Czechia: Cost structures and policy implications

Autoři

ŠKRABAL, Jaroslav; Michal TVRDOŇ; Michal KRAJŇÁK a Martina PAVLAČKOVÁ

Vydání

Local Economy, 2026, 0269-0942

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Článek v odborném periodiku

Obor

50200 5.2 Economics and Business

Stát vydavatele

Velká Británie a Severní Irsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Impakt faktor

Impact factor: 1.600 v roce 2024

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Organizační jednotka

Obchodně podnikatelská fakulta v Karviné

EID Scopus

Klíčová slova česky

brownfield regeneration; EU co-financing; project cost structures; regional disparities; cohesion policy; fiscal governance; sustainability

Klíčová slova anglicky

brownfield regeneration; EU co-financing; project cost structures; regional disparities; cohesion policy; fiscal governance; sustainability

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 4. 6. 2026 11:45, prof. Mgr. Ing. Michal Tvrdoň, Ph.D.

Anotace

V originále

Brownfield regeneration has become an important component of regional development policy in Czechia, yet little is known about how financing structures shape the outcomes of such investments. This study examines how project costs, end uses and regional conditions influence the distribution of EU co-financing across Czech NUTS3 regions. Drawing on project-level data from two programming periods (2014-2020 and 2021-2027), we analyse patterns in public and private participation and the fiscal role of EU funds. The results show that public actors consistently secure higher EU contributions, while total project costs do not systematically differ from those of private beneficiaries. We also find that higher project costs are associated with lower EU co-financing in 2014-2020, suggesting a disciplining effect of grant rules, although this pattern has not yet emerged in the current period. Disadvantaged regions tend to rely more heavily on EU transfers, whereas stronger regions mobilise greater private resources. These findings highlight the role of EU cohesion policy as both an investment instrument and a fiscal governance mechanism with implications for long-term regional sustainability.